Research or teaching? Contradictory demands on Swedish teacher educators and the consequences for the quality of teacher education

Authors

  • Petra Angervall University of Borås
  • Richard Baldwin University of Borås
  • Dennis Beach University of Borås

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47989/kpdc60

Keywords:

teacher education; teacher educators; teaching work; research; professionalism

Abstract

Based on a policy analysis and interviews with assistant lecturers and lecturers (with a PhD) who are heavily involved in teacher education, the present article addresses contemporary tensions and challenges in Swedish teacher education. The point of departure is the theoretical framework of mission stretch and the third space professional in teacher education with the aim of investigating how teacher educators experience and navigate their daily work. The findings of the study illustrate the tensions teacher educators experience between research and teaching tasks, between a constant flow of tasks, large student groups, and demands of high-quality teaching. The findings also show a gap between the practical anchoring of some research in teacher education and feelings of tension between teaching practices and the value of research. In conclusion, teacher education would seem to be developing into a cluster of tasks, challenges, expectations, and skills. This indicates that teaching and research are not the only missions and cannot be taken for granted in light of how teachers struggle to define their professional knowledge and value with respect to increasingly strong competitive demands for research performance.

References

Acker, S. (2014). A foot in the revolving door? Women academics in lower-middle management. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 73-85.

Ahlbäck Öberg, S., Bennich-Björkman, L., Hermansson, J., Jarstad, A., Karlsson, C., & Widmalm, S. (Eds.) (2016). Det hotade universitetet. Stockholm: Dialogos Förlag.

Allan, J. (2014). Making a difference, in theory, in Sweden and the UK. Education Inquiry, 5(3), 319-335.

Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2016). (Un)Conditional surrender? Why do professionals willingly comply with managerialism. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29(1), 29-45

Angervall, P., & Beach, D. (2017). Dividing academic work: gender and academic career at Swedish universities. Gender and Education, 32(3), 347-362.

Angervall, P., Gustafsson, J., & Silfver, E. (2018). Academic career: on institutions, social capital and gender. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(6), 1095-1108.

Archer, L. (2008). The new neoliberal subjects? Young/er academics’ constructions of professional identity. Journal of Education Policy, 23(3), 265–85.

Bagley, C., & Beach, D. (2015). The marginalisation of social justice as a form of knowledge in teacher-education in England. Policy Futures in Education, 13(4), 1-15.

Beach, D. (1995). Making sense of the problems of change. Göteborg Studies in Educational Science, 100. Göteborg: Acta.

Beach, D. (2011). Education science in Sweden: Promoting research for teacher education or weakening its scientific foundations? Education Inquiry, 2(2), 207-220.

Beach, D. (2013). Changing higher education: Converging policy-packages, policy association and changing academic work. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 517-533.

Beach, D. (2019). Formación del profesorado, diversidad cultural, justicia social e igualdad: políticas, desafíos y posibilidades abandonadas en la educación de los maestros suecos. [Teacher education for cultural diversity, social justice and equality: policies, challenges and abandoned possibilities in Sweden's teacher education]. Profesorado: Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 23(4), 26-44.

Beach, D. (2020). Maybe one in a hundred or one in a thousand in the neoliberal, new-managerial university! Aesthetics of experience and the question of transgressive critical thinking. Ethnography and Education, online first.

Beach, D., & Bagley, C., A. (2012). The weakening role of education studies and the re-traditionalisation of Swedish teacher education. Oxford Review of Education, 38, 287-303.

Beach, D., Bagley, C., Eriksson, A., & Player-Koro, C. (2014). Changing teacher-education in Sweden: Using meta-ethnographic analysis to understand and describe policymaking and educational changes, Teaching and Teacher-education, 44(2), 160-167.

Berg, L. D., Huijbens, E. H., & Larsen, H. G. (2016). Producing anxiety in the neoliberal university. The Canadian Geographer/le géographe canadien, 60(2), 168–180.

Bienenstock, A., Schwaag-Serger, S., Benner, M., & Lidgård, A. (2014). Utbildning, forskning, samverkan. Vad kan svenska universitet lära av Stanford och Berkeley? [Combining excellence in education, research and impact: inspiration from Stanford and Berkeley and implications for Swedish universities]. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.

Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Drennan, L. (2001). Quality Assessment and the Tension between Teaching and Research. Quality in Higher Education, 7(3), 167-178.

Enders, J., & Boer, H. (2009). The mission impossible of the European University: Institutional confusion and institutional diversity. In A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin, & P. Maassen (Eds.), European Integration and the Governance of Higher Education and Research (pp. 159-178). Netherlands: Springer.

Enders, J., & Musselin, C. (2008). Back to the future? The academic professions in the 21st Century, in Higher Education to 2030, Volume 1, Demography. Paris: OECD Publishing.

European Commission (2016). Directorate-General for Research and Innovation: She Figures. https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_gender_equality/she_figures_2015-final.pdf

Gardner, S. (2013). Women faculty departures from a striving institution: Between a rock and a hard place. The Review of Higher Education, 36(3), 349-370.

Garrick, J., & Rhodes, C. (Eds.). (2000). Research and knowledge at work. London: Routledge.

Geschwind, L., & Broström, A. (2015). Managing the teaching–research nexus: ideals and practice in research-oriented universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 60-73.

Government Bill (1948: 27). Skolkommissionens slutbetänkande. [The

consideration of the 1948’s school commission, with suggestions for the development of the Swedish school education]. Stockholm. Fakta info direct.

Government Bill (1980: 3). Lärare i högskolan – Förslag till ny arbets- och tjänsteorganisation. [Teachers in higher education]. Stockholm. Fakta info direkt.

Government Bill (1999: 63). Att lära och leda. En lärarutbildning för samverkan och utveckling. [Learning leading. Teacher education, collaboration and development]. Lärarutbildningskommitténs slutbetänkande. Stockholm: Fakta info direkt.

Government Bill (2007: 98) Karriär för kvalitet. [Career for quality]. Stockholm: Fakta info direct.

Government Bill. (2008: 109). En hållbar lärarutbildning. [Sustainable teacher education]. Stockholm: Fakta info direct.

Government Bill (2009/10: 89). Bäst i klassen. [Top of the class]. Stockholm: Fakta info direct.

Henderson, B. B., & Kane, W. D. (1991). Caught in the middle: Faculty and institutional status and quality in state comprehensive universities. Higher Education, 22, 339-350.

Högskoleverket (2006). Universitet och högskolor. Högskoleverkets årsrapport 2006, 2006:26 R.

Jacob, M. (2009). Out with Humboldt and in with the knowledge society: On the consequences of the redefinition of the role of higher education and research. In M. Tight, K. H. Mok, J. Huisman, & C. Morphew (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education (pp. 501-509). London: Routledge.

Jenkins, A., & Healey, M. (2005). Institutional strategies to link teaching and research. York: Higher Education Academy.

Kallós, D. (2009). Varför är det så förtvivlat svårt att bygga upp forskning och forskarutbildning i anslutning till lärarutbildning och pedagogisk yrkesverksamhet? Om myndighetsmissbruk, svek och andra missförhållanden. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige 14(3), 237-249.

Keisu, B.-I., & Carbin, M. (2014). Administrators or critical cynics? A study of gender equality workers in Swedish Higher Education. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 22(3), 204-218.

Leisyte, L. (2007). University governance and academic research. Case studies of research units in Dutch and English universities. Enschede: CHEPS, University of Twente.

Leisyte, L., Enders, J., & de Boer, H. F. (2009). The balance between teaching and research in Dutch and English universities in the context of university governance reforms. Higher Education, 58(5), 619-635.

Lindberg, O. (2004). Utbildningsvetenskap och utbildningsvetenskaplig forskning– några europeiska nedslag. [Educational Sciences and research – European cases]. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.

Lindqvist, P., Nordänger, U. K., & Carlsson, R. (2014). Teacher attrition the first five years—A multifaceted image. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 40, 94-103.

Lucas, L. (2006). The research game in academic life. Maidenhead, UK: SRHE/Open University Press.

Misra, J., Lundquist, J. H., Holmes, E., & Agiomavritis, S. (2011). The ivory ceiling of service work. Academe Online, 97(1). www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2011/JF/Feat/misr.htm

National University Board of Higher Education (2018). Universitet och högskolor. UKÄ, Årsrapport, 2018:5. Stockholm.

Nilsson Lindström, M., & Beach, D. (2015). Changes in teacher-education in Sweden in the neo-liberal age: Toward an occupation in itself or a profession for itself. Education Inquiry, 6(3), 241-258.

Palfreyman, D., & Tapper, T. (2009). Structuring mass higher education: The role of elite institutions. New York: Routledge.

Savage, G., & Lingard, B. (2018). Changing modes of governance in Australian teacher education policy. In N. Hobbel, & B. Bales (Eds.), Navigating the common good in teacher education policy: Critical and international perspectives (pp. 64-80). New York: Routledge.

SFS (1977: 459). Förordning om införandet av högskoleförordningen. [Regulating Higher Education: Laws and rules]. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.

SFS (1985: 702). Om ändring i högskoleförordningen, [New Directives in the Higher Education Bill]. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.

Smith, D. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.

Swedish Research Council (VR) (2019). Education Sciences. Year report. Stockholm.

Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Bamber, V. (2012). Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century: Rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education. London: Routledge/Open University.

Wahlström, N., & Alvunger, D. (2015). Forskningsbasering av lärarutbildningen. [Research based on teacher education]. Swedish Research Council.

Wallace, E., Hogan, M., Noone, C., & Groarke, J. (2018). Investigating components and causes of sabotage by academics using collective intelligence analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), 2113-2131.

Whitchurch, C. (2013). Reconstructing identities in higher education: The rise of third space professionals. New York: Routledge.

Åstrand, B. (2006). Aspects of recent reforms of teacher education in Sweden. Paper presented at Seminar on Modernization of Study Programmes in Teachers’ Education in an International Context. Ljubljana. http://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:150395/FULLTEXT02.pdf

Öhrn, E., & Lundahl, L. (Eds.) (2013). Kön och karriär i akademin: En studie inom det utbildningsvetenskapliga fältet. [Gender and Career in Academia: A study from within Educational Sciences]. Göteborgs Universitet. Acta.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-09

How to Cite

Angervall, P., Baldwin, R., & Beach, D. (2020). Research or teaching? Contradictory demands on Swedish teacher educators and the consequences for the quality of teacher education. Journal of Praxis in Higher Education, 2(1), pp. 63–84. https://doi.org/10.47989/kpdc60

Issue

Section

Research Articles (peer-reviewed)